The US and UK will send troops to evacuate staff from their embassies in Kabul as Taliban insurgents are closing in on the capital after capturing the country’s second and third largest cities, following US president Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw American troops.
The Pentagon said it would send 3,000 troops in the next two days, including aircraft that could fly personnel out of the Afghan capital.
A contingent of 3,500 soldiers will act as backup in Kuwait, and another 1,000 US soldiers will be sent to Qatar for technical and logistical support.
Only a small number of personnel would remain in the US embassy. “We are further reducing our footprint in Kabul in light of the evolving security situation,” Ned Price, a state department spokesperson said on Thursday. There are currently 1,400 Americans stationed at the embassy.
American negotiators have also been trying to get assurances from the Taliban that they will not attack the US embassy once they enter Kabul.
Meanwhile, the UK plans to send some 600 soldiers to Afghanistan to help evacuate British nationals, UK defence secretary Ben Wallace said. There are an estimated 4,000 British citizens in the country.
Canada is also planning to send special forces to get embassy staff out.
The evacuation moves underline the surprising speed with which the Taliban have been advancing, with little effective resistance by the Afghan security forces.
The insurgents have so far captured at least 12 provincial capitals in less than a week, including Herat, Afghanistan’s third-biggest city, and Kandahar, the country’s second-largest city in the south, on Thursday.
Thousands of Afghan civilians have fled to Kabul to try to escape the fighting, which is seen as the last bastion of security.
Earlier, military experts said the Taliban could put Kabul under pressure within a month, but that is now likely to happen sooner.
The US military withdrawal – which started in May and was to be completed by the end of the month, as well as the subsequent evacuation – drew parallels with the fall of Saigon in 1975, when Americans stationed in the US embassy were evacuated from a rooftop by helicopter.
In the meantime, talks between representatives of the Taliban and the Afghan government wrapped up in Qatar on Thursday without progress.
Several countries, including the US, Pakistan, the EU, and China, issued a joint statement saying they would not recognise any government in Afghanistan “imposed through the use of military force.”
EU warns of lack of support
The EU for its part warned the Taliban on Thursday that it would face being cut off by the international community if it seized power through violence.
“If power is taken by force and an Islamic Emirate re-established, the Taliban would face non-recognition, isolation, lack of international support and the prospect of continued conflict and protracted instability in Afghanistan,” EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said in a statement.
“The EU aims to continue its partnership and support to the Afghan people. However, support will be conditioned on a peaceful and inclusive settlement and respect for the fundamental rights of all Afghans, including women, youth, and minorities,” Borrell said.
He insisted that “it is critical that the significant gains made by women and girls over the past two decades are preserved, including as regards access to education.”
The statement called for “an immediate halt of the ongoing violence” and urged the Taliban to resume peace talks with the government in Kabul.
“The EU condemns the increasing violations of International Humanitarian Law and human rights, in particular in Taliban-controlled areas and in cities,” it said.
Borrell said the 27-nation bloc also encouraged the authorities in Kabul “to settle political differences, increase representation of all stakeholders and engage with the Taliban from a united perspective.”
France attacks US over ‘stab in back’ submarine deal
France has called a US deal to develop nuclear-powered submarine technology with Australia and the UK, but not any EU countries, unveiled Thursday, a “stab in the back,” in the words of French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian. The move is to see France lose out on a multibillion-euro submarine-technology deal with Australia. “This is not over. We’re going to need clarifications. We have contracts,” Le Drian added.
‘A forgotten disaster’: earthquake-hit Haitians left to fend for themselves | Global development
David Nazaire, a 45-year-old coffee farmer from Beaumont, a small village in rural southern Haiti, was getting ready to harvest when an earthquake struck his home and livelihood. Much of the farming infrastructure – as well as nearby homes, schools and churches – was damaged or completely destroyed. A month later, he and thousands of rural Haitians – those most severely affected by the tremor – are still waiting for relief, and are not expecting it to arrive soon.
“The earthquake didn’t destroy our crops, but it did take everything else,” Nazaire says, outside a neighbour’s house, now a pile of rubble beneath plastic roof tiles supported by the remnants of concrete walls. “We were just getting ready to harvest, but that’s lost now.”
The 7.2 magnitude earthquake that struck southern Haiti on 14 August killed more than 2,200 and left 30,000 homeless. But while foreign aid and builders have been trickling into urban centres such as Les Cayes, the capital of Sud province, and other quake-struck areas, many rural Haitians see an all too familiar abandonment.
“Haiti has always been divided between an urban professional class and the ignored rural communities,” says Estève Ustache, 58, a researcher on rural development attached to a Methodist church outside Jeremie, another quake-struck town. “You have to ask yourself, why do leaders and aid workers only travel to these rural areas in a helicopter? Because they know it would be nearly impossible to go otherwise.”
Haiti is the poorest country in the western hemisphere, where nearly half of the 11.4m population is food insecure. But the poverty in which rural Haitians – who make up two-thirds of the population – live is startling, even by the country’s own abject standards.
The drive to Tricon, a rural hamlet just a few miles from Les Cayes – the regional capital – takes more than an hour. The road has never been paved and heavy rains can leave it impassable. Communities live in shacks built partly from material scavenged in the city. The phone signal is unreliable, and aside from a handful of community-built wells, there is no water supply.
“Everything we have, we built ourselves,” says Moise Magaly, 49, who was tending to her bean crops when the earth beneath her began thrashing, throwing her to the ground and making her arm “go crack”.
Most in the community are gaunt, after a dry spell that led to crops of cassava, beans and corn failing to yield their usual harvest. Vetiver, a cash crop often used to combat soil erosion, has been over-farmed in the area, further damaging the land.
Magaly’s house was damaged in the earthquake, knocking out the walls but leaving the roof standing on top of wooden struts. Like almost everyone else in southern Haiti, the fear of aftershocks and another quake has kept her sleeping outside, vulnerable to the Atlantic hurricane season.
“I don’t know why no one comes for us,” Magaly says, clutching at her arm. “We’ve contacted the media and our representatives but we’ve heard nothing.”
Aid has arrived in the country, with the US delivering more than 60 tonnes of aid to quake-hit regions, while Britain has pledged £1m of support, including shelter kits and solar-powered lanterns.
But some working on the relief effort worry that as international compassion wanes, so too will the funds from donors.
“It’s a very poor area, where people don’t have the resources or the funds for materials to build their houses well,” says Kit Miyamoto, a structural engineer who runs a firm and foundation that works in Haiti and around the world to improve earthquake preparedness. “And this is a forgotten disaster because it happens out of the eyes of the world, which means there will be less funding.”
Miyamoto adds that rural homes, churches and schools were more affected than those in cities because many of them were built before 2010, when improved building codes were adopted nationwide after a catastrophic earthquake struck the capital Port-au-Prince, killing more than 200,000.
“Construction is different now, and people are more conscious of how to build in a way that does the little things right, and makes the difference,” Miyamoto says.
But despite growing awareness of resilient construction techniques, the relief effort remains hampered by the sheer isolation of the most affected communities, and some are giving up hope.
“No one has been here since the earthquake. Just like before, the only time we see an outsider round here is when they want our votes,” says Altema Jean Joseph, a 52-year-old farmer who grows vetiver, an ingredient used in expensive perfumes which, despite costing $25,000 (£18,000) a barrel, makes farmers only $4 a week. “So why would we expect them here? We’ll have to build back ourselves.”
MEPs suspect Gazprom manipulating gas price
European gas prices have risen by more than 170 percent since the start of this year – raising concerns for worsening energy poverty.
On Friday [17 September], the European Commission said it “monitored” the situation in a press conference.
The commission said that a global increase in gas demand had caused prices to spike.
But 42 MEPs, ranging from the Greens, through the EPP, S&D and Renew Europe, to ID on the right, suspect that the Russian gas giant Gazprom is manipulating market prices and sent a letter on Thursday asking the commission to open an investigation.
According to the letter – seen by this website – Gazprom has refused to guarantee additional volumes of supply “despite available information that Gazprom has sufficient production capacity.”
The signatories also raised suspicion that Gazprom is pressuring Europe to agree to an immediate launch of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, despite its non-compliance with EU energy market regulations.
While speaking at an online conference, Alexei Miller, the head of Gazprom, warned that natural gas prices in Europe will in fact rise even further – but said that was due to low storage levels.
When quizzed on Friday, the commission said it had received the letter and would look into the matter. However, when pressured further, the representative did not want to go into detail.
The EU has, however, accused Gazprom of market manipulation in the past.
Lower renewable prices?
Meanwhile, higher prices are reverberating through other parts of the economy.
On Friday, Yara, the second-biggest producer of fertiliser globally, and with large production bases in the EU, announced it would reduce its ammonia production by 40 percent due to the current high gas prices. Ammonia is used to produce ammonium nitrate, which is a widely-used fertiliser.
Of 4.9m tonnes of ammonia produced in Europe, the company said it planned to reduce production by approximately 2m tonnes in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and France – which in turn might affect food prices.
Household energy prices have also begun to rise.
In Spain, a megawatt-hour of electricity has increased from €46 to €154 in a year, prompting the Spanish government to intervene in the energy market and lower taxes on gas and electricity.
Commission vice president Frans Timmermans was critical of this plan: “You can’t just do that,” he said on Wednesday. “The free energy market is the basis on which we base our energy prices.”
But according to the think tank Bruegel, major gas-price increases do pose a problem for European countries. Higher prices affect low-income households and member states disproportionately.
According to Eurostat, 30 percent of people in Bulgaria cannot afford to keep their house warm. In total, 34m people suffer from what is called ‘energy poverty.’
Rising gas prices will exacerbate this.
While temporary measures like direct payments to citizens can help cushion the effects of the current high prices, Bruegel says that European leaders can avoid future prices hikes structurally – by committing to renewable energy.
EU energy commissioner Kadri Simson also mentioned renewable energy as a way to stabilise prices.
But Bruegel writes that governments have not yet committed enough to green energy: “Clearer commitments from governments will imply growing electricity demand. As a result, investors will not have to worry about over-investing in low-carbon power systems.”
Teenager arrested after car driven through Co Down parade, injuring two
OPINION: France’s Australian submarine row shows that Macron was right about NATO
New Donegal digital hub opens doors to local start-ups and entrepreneurs
The 1915 Armenian Genocide and its Russophobic Origins
The Religious Roots of Russia’s Mistrust towards the West
Harvest Moon: One World review – a farming game that’s gone to seed | Games
Technology1 week ago
Amazon Elasticsearch Service is so flexible it wants to be called by a new name • The Register
Culture1 week ago
EXPLAINED: How to get Switzerland’s Covid certificate with a negative test
Technology5 days ago
Ireland is Europe’s ‘Wild West’ of data protection
Current1 week ago
Food is as important as beaches when it comes to buying Cornish homes
Current1 week ago
Rotunda to extend visiting hours for partners of pregnant women
Current1 week ago
Amount of waste packaging in Ireland grew by 11% in 2019 – EPA
Technology6 days ago
Jagmeet Singh: the ex-lawyer and TikTok star who could topple Trudeau | Canada
Technology1 week ago
Can Facebook finally make smart glasses work?