The Voice Of EU | As the world grapples with the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on employment, it’s worth revisiting historical perspectives to glean insights for the future. Back in 1938, amidst the throes of the Great Depression, the discourse on technological unemployment was already underway. MIT’s President at the time, Karl T. Compton, penned an article in MIT Technology Review, dissecting the myth of “technological unemployment.”
Compton’s analysis shed light on a crucial distinction: while technological progress spurred overall economic growth and job creation, it also led to disruptions and job losses for certain individuals and communities. This nuanced understanding remains relevant today as we confront the transformative potential of AI and automation.
The Evolution of Job Market Dynamics
In the 1930s, fears of technological unemployment were rampant, akin to contemporary concerns over AI. John Maynard Keynes had warned of a new affliction—technological unemployment—proposing that labor-saving advancements were outpacing the creation of new jobs. Similarly, in the early 1960s, anxieties persisted about automation outpacing labor demand, prompting MIT Technology Review to debunk these fears through the writings of economist Robert Solow.
The proliferation of AI and digital technologies in the early 2010s reignited debates on job displacement and the future of work. Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee’s argument in MIT Technology Review underscored fears of AI eliminating jobs faster than creating them. Even President Barack Obama acknowledged the impact of automation on job obsolescence, emphasizing the need for adaptation in the face of technological change.
Understanding AI’s Impact on Employment
Breakthroughs in generative AI, exemplified by models, herald a transformative era in the economy and labor markets. While concerns persist about job displacement, evidence suggests that AI’s impact on productivity growth may not lead to widespread unemployment.
The Jobs Landscape:
Estimates from Goldman Sachs indicate that around two-thirds of US jobs are exposed to some degree of automation by AI. However, this exposure doesn’t equate to wholesale job replacement; rather, AI integration is expected to augment existing roles and tasks.
Job Creation and Innovation:
Innovation historically has led to the creation of new job categories, augmenting the workforce’s capabilities and expanding economic potential. MIT researchers highlight the crucial question of whether automation is accelerating relative to augmentation, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to technological integration.
Navigating the Future of Work
Compton’s call for responsible management in times of technological transition remains pertinent, emphasizing the need for companies to prioritize the public good over short-term profits. AI companies, wielding significant influence, must shoulder greater responsibility for mitigating the adverse effects of technological disruption on workers.
Relying on the trope of a jobless future facilitated by AI overlooks the ethical imperative to shape technology’s trajectory towards inclusive growth and job creation. Choices made today will define the future of work, highlighting the importance of ethical decision-making and equitable distribution of AI’s benefits.
In navigating the complex terrain of AI’s impact on employment, history serves as a guidepost, reminding us of the enduring significance of responsible innovation and ethical stewardship.
As we confront the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, embracing a holistic approach that prioritizes societal well-being is paramount. By leveraging AI to augment human potential and foster inclusive economic growth, we can shape a future where technological progress serves the collective good.
We Can’t Thank You Enough For Your Support!
— By Darren Wilson, Team VoiceOfEU.com
— For more: Info@VoiceOfEU.com
— Anonymous news submissions: Press@VoiceOfEU.com
Congratulations, Privacy Just Took A Great Leap Out the Window!
Your Data Is Being Used Without Your Permission And Knowledge
The Voice Of EU | In the heart of technological innovation, the collision between intellectual property rights and the development of cutting-edge AI technologies has sparked a significant legal battle. The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, filing a lawsuit in Manhattan federal court. This legal maneuver aims to address concerns surrounding the unauthorized use of the Times’ content for the training of AI models, alleging copyright infringements that could potentially result in billions of dollars in damages.
This legal tussle underlines the escalating tension between technological advancements and the protection of intellectual property. The crux of the lawsuit revolves around OpenAI and Microsoft allegedly utilizing the Times’ proprietary content to advance their own AI technology, directly competing with the publication’s services. The lawsuit suggests that this unauthorized utilization threatens the Times’ ability to offer its distinctive service and impacts its AI innovation, creating a competitive landscape that challenges the publication’s proprietary content.
Amidst the growing digital landscape, media organizations like the Times are confronting a myriad of challenges. The migration of readers to online platforms has significantly impacted traditional media, and the advent of artificial intelligence technology has added another layer of complexity. The legal dispute brings to the forefront the contentious practice of AI companies scraping copyrighted information from online sources, including articles from media organizations, to train their generative AI chatbots. This strategy has attracted substantial investments, rapidly transforming the AI landscape.
The lawsuit highlights instances where OpenAI’s technology, specifically GPT-4, replicated significant portions of Times articles, including in-depth investigative reports. These outputs, alleged by the Times to contain verbatim excerpts from their content, raise concerns about the ethical and legal boundaries of using copyrighted material for AI model training without proper authorization or compensation.
The legal action taken by the Times follows attempts to engage in discussions with Microsoft and OpenAI, aiming to address concerns about the use of its intellectual property. Despite these efforts, negotiations failed to reach a resolution that would ensure fair compensation for the use of the Times’ content while promoting responsible AI development that benefits society.
In the midst of this legal battle, the broader questions surrounding the responsible and ethical utilization of copyrighted material in advancing technological innovations come to the forefront.
The dispute between the Times, OpenAI, and Microsoft serves as a significant case study in navigating the intricate intersection of technological progress and safeguarding intellectual property rights in the digital age.
‘The Bill Gates Problem’ – The Case Against World’s Richest Man
The Case Against World’s Richest Man
When Clinton assumed the presidency of the United States, there was eager anticipation from the Chinese, not for Clinton himself, but for Bill Gates. This was during the late 1990s, a period when the internet was still in its nascent stages, and the digital boom of the early 2000s had not yet reached its peak. The enigmatic persona that captivated the attention of the burgeoning Asian powerhouse is now portrayed in “The Bill Gates Problem” as a “domineering, brusque figure” whose demeanor is likened to “a cauldron of passions that freely erupts.” According to a former employee cited in the book, Gates was perceived as “a complete and utter jerk to people 70% of the time,” while the remaining 30% saw him as a “harmless, enjoyable, exceptionally intelligent nerd.”
The 1990s were also the decade of the conflict between Microsoft and the now defunct Netscape browser, which challenged what was already being openly described as the former’s monopolistic practices. Gates was investigated and accused in Congress for such practices; he ultimately won the battle, but the case harmed his reputation, and in 2000 he resigned as CEO of his company. From there he undertook an expansion of the foundation that he had established with his wife and to which he has dedicated his main efforts in the last two decades. In 2006, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation received the Prince of Asturias Award for International Cooperation.
With a personal fortune of $100 billion and tens of billions more in his private foundation, Gates has been one of the richest men in the world for decades, and the foundation has been the most generous organization of its kind, specializing above all in health aid, education and child nutrition, with a large presence in Africa and India among other regions of what was formerly known as the Third World. Tim Schwab, a contributor to the weekly left-wing newspaper The Nation, undertook a detailed investigation to denounce something that in truth was already known: that American foundations are largely a way for billionaires to avoid taxes.
To prove this, he thoroughly looked into the accounts and procedures of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the failures and occasional successes of its philanthropic policies, and came to the conclusion that behind this facade of help to the needy hides an operation of power. He is ruthless in his criticism, although accurate in his analysis of the growing inequality in the world. Absorbed by the revolutionary rhetoric, he laments that the Gates Foundation has remained “deadly silent” regarding movements such as Occupy Wall Street or Black Lives Matter, which demand social change in the face of the “excess wealth and ‘white savior’ mentality that drives Bill Gates’ philanthropic work.” He does attribute some good intentions, but his criticism is merciless, sometimes even coarse, while the absence of solutions for the problems he denounces — other than the calls for do-goodism — is frustrating.
His abilities as an investigative journalist are thus overshadowed by a somewhat naive militancy against the creative capitalism that Gates promotes and an evident intention to discredit not only his work but, above all, him. The demands he makes for transparency and the accusations of obscurity are dulled by the author himself in the pages he dedicates to Gates’ relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, the famous corruptor of minors at the service of the international jet set. Gates has explained his meetings and interviews with him on countless occasions, and in no case has any type of relationship, other than their commercial relations or some confusing efforts to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, been proved. Still, Schwab raises, with no evidence whatsoever, the possibility that their relationship “could have had something to do with Epstein’s principal activities in life: sexual gratification and the exercise of power.” The book is full of this kind of opinions and speculations, to the detriment of a more serious analysis of Gates’ mistakes in the management of his foundation, the problems of shielding the intellectual property of vaccines in the hands of the pharmaceutical industries and, ultimately, the objective power that big technology companies have in global society.
He signed a collaboration agreement with the RAE to improve Microsoft’s grammar checker and was interested in the substantial unity of the Spanish language in all the countries where almost 600 million people speak it. That man was very far from the sexist, arrogant, miserable predator that Schwab portrays. Nor did we deduce — and this can be applied to the personal adventure of Steve Jobs, Larry Page, Zuckerberg, Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos — that his life’s goal was world domination, as suggested by this book. If they have achieved it, or may achieve it, it is due to the dynamics of digital civilization and the objective difficulties in governing it. The deregulation of financial capitalism, which has increased inequality among humankind, is due to the incompetence of obsolete political institutions and to leaders who care more about their own fates than those of their people. The criticism against “lame and wasteful government bureaucracies” might be part of the propaganda promoted by the world’s wealthy, but lately we have also heard it from small-scale farmers across Europe.
In conclusion, we found the book to be more entertaining than interesting. It provides a lot of information — we’re not sure if it’s entirely verified — and plenty of cheap ideology. Above all, one can see the personal crusade of the author, determined to prove that Bill Gates is a problem for democracy and that millionaire philanthropists are a bunch of swindlers. The world needs their money; maybe managed by party bureaucracies, that much is not clear. Bill Gates’ money, that is, but not Bill Gates himself.
Brazil’s G20 Presidency Kicks Off In Rio With Foreign Ministers Meeting | International
Foreign ministers of the Group of 20 nations were gathering Wednesday in Rio de Janeiro to discuss poverty, climate change and heightened global tensions as Brazil takes on the annual presidency of the bloc.
The ministers and other representatives of the 20 leading rich and developing nations planned to spend two days setting a roadmap for work to accomplish ahead of a Nov. 18-19 summit in Rio.
One of Brazil’s key proposals, set by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, is a reform of global governance institutions such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization and multilateral banks, where he wants to push for stronger representation of developing nations.
Brazil’s ambassador to the bloc, Mauricio Lyrio, said at a news conference Tuesday that structural reforms of international institutions are urgent because of a proliferation of conflicts around the world — not just in Ukraine and Gaza, but in a total of 183 locations, according to one study, he said.
“We have practically returned to the level of conflicts seen in the Cold War period. This shows that there is a lack of governance to deal with current challenges,” said Lyrio, who is the economic affairs secretary at Brazil’s Foreign Affairs Ministry.
“It is one thing to work for peace in each conflict; another thing is to have a global governance that prevents conflicts from occurring,” Lyrio said. “We’re basically putting out fires.”
After years of diplomatic isolation under former President Jair Bolsonaro, Lula has sought to reinsert Brazil on the center stage of global diplomacy since returning to power in January of 2023.
Lucas Pereira Rezende, a political scientist at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, said Lula was especially well-suited for the role, recalling that during his earlier terms as president from 2003 to 2010 he was once called “the most popular politician on Earth” by then-U.S. President Barack Obama.
The G20 “is a very important international stage, especially at a time when the world is facing two major wars, involving large states, and also at a time when multilateralism is in crisis,” Rezende told The Associated Press.
“But Lula is a very strong international actor and has a very strong multilateral role, especially when presenting himself as a leader of underdeveloped or developing countries.”
G20 finance ministers and central bank presidents are set to meet next week in Sao Paulo, and a second meeting of foreign ministers is scheduled for September.
‘Conversations Outside The Cathedral’: The fight for abortion rights in Colombia | Culture
‘Mrs. Doubtfire’: The highlights Of Robin Williams’ Role That defined His Artistic Greatness
Congratulations, Privacy Just Took A Great Leap Out the Window!
NSA asks congress to reauthorize warrantless data collection • The Register
Resurrected mummies and ancient cities: The problem with AI-generated images | Science & Tech
Madonna’s Last Tour: Summarizing four decades of successes, scandals & cultural milestones in two hours
Global Affairs6 days ago
How Entrepreneurial Mindset Is Necessary For Startup Triumph
Culture6 days ago
Atticus Finch: A Timeless Character With Gregory Peck’s Perfection In Versatility
Current1 day ago
Congratulations, Privacy Just Took A Great Leap Out the Window!
Current6 days ago
Mastering The Art Of The Pitch And Insights From Google’s 12-Word Success Story
Global Affairs4 days ago
16 UK Tech Innovators Poised For Unicorn Status
Current4 days ago
GSK’s Mosquirix Is Revolutionizing The Fight Against Malaria
Culture3 days ago
Conflicted History: ‘Oppenheimer’ And Its Impact On Los Alamos And New Mexico Downwinders
Culture4 days ago
The Complex World of Cyber Warfare & Digital Battlefield