Connect with us


Udacity’s EMEA VP on why upskilling is a ‘win-win situation’

Voice Of EU



Samuel Schofield from online learning company Udacity shares his insights into current skills trends and explains why reskilling doesn’t always have to lead to a career change.

Upskilling and reskilling are integral in a world where new technologies keep emerging and jobs are rapidly changing. This is something companies and workers alike need to recognise, according to Udacity’s Samuel Schofield.

As the online learning company’s EMEA vice-president, Schofield is well versed in the skills trends sweeping the global workforce. Here, he explains why making the most of them requires acting now – whether you’re an employer or an employee.

‘Those companies that have truly grasped the power of upskilling will be those that thrive in the next five to 10 years’

Is upskilling important for today’s workforce?

Absolutely. The concept of upskilling has never been more important, particularly as the rate of digital transformation continues to increase and job markets around the world remain in flux.

Upskilling needs to be front of mind not just for ambitious individuals looking to advance their career, but also for enterprises looking to scale and grow.

Click here to check out the top sci-tech employers hiring right now.

As digital transformation continues at pace, the primary issue for companies remains finding the right talent. There is a clear trend towards companies looking to develop an outstanding internal talent pool that leverages upskilling to learn and apply cutting-edge new technologies.

Those companies that have truly grasped the power of upskilling will be those that thrive in the next five to 10 years. Upskilling can have a significant and lasting impact on the bottom line.

Many businesses have also redesigned their work processes to adapt to the pandemic, with e-commerce fulfilment centres being an obvious example. As many as two-thirds of executives surveyed by McKinsey said they were increasing investment in automation and AI solutions either ‘somewhat’ or ‘significantly’. It goes without saying that enterprises must equip their employees with the knowledge and skills they need to implement new technology.

Automation is a growing concern for the labour market as a whole. The World Economic Forum (WEF) predicts that by 2025, 85m jobs will be displaced by technology advancements, while 97m more will emerge.

Do you think employers have a responsibility to upskill and reskill their staff?

Yes, employers have an important responsibility to provide staff with upskilling and reskilling opportunities. Not least because the labour market is evolving at such a pace that continuous learning is necessary to prepare employees for the jobs of the future.

Perception of education must also evolve. Employers are beginning to place greater value on practical, project-based learning initiatives to continuously update current skillsets and ensure they are directly transferable.

In today’s world, where remote working is increasingly the norm, skills training is an important way for employers to give purpose to their staff, empowering them in their roles, increasing motivation and engagement, and affirming loyalty.

It’s a win-win situation. Workers often consider training and development prospects when choosing employers. By providing access to upskilling and reskilling courses and online platforms, employers retain loyal and motivated staff, save on recruitment expenses and create a more resilient workforce to ensure the business stays innovative and competitive.

More and more, we’re seeing enterprises of various sizes embrace online learning initiatives.

Which areas should people be thinking about when deciding to upskill or reskill?

We’re seeing the digital skills gap growing in technical areas such as AI, cloud computing, cybersecurity and data science. The demand for specialised technical talent is significantly outpacing supply.

The WEF lists the top three increasingly sought-after jobs as data analysts and scientists, AI and machine learning specialists, and big data specialists. These are highly skilled roles that many organisations are having a hard time filling, particularly those in sectors not used to hiring technical employees in these fields.

At Udacity, all of our nanodegree programmes are built alongside industry experts who understand the skills gaps in industry. Some of our most popular programmes include data analyst, data scientist, AI product manager, as well as courses focused on Python or C++. We also offer an introduction to programming course.

I would advise anyone looking to upskill to have a clear plan. You need to think about the kind of programme you want to study, the time and effort you can commit and the level of support you think may be necessary. Have a clear future role in mind before building up a set of skills.

How can someone know whether upskilling or reskilling in a certain area is right for them?

Upskilling can – but doesn’t have to – mean a career change. At Udacity, we look at upskilling as adding additional strings to your bow. It’s often more about future-proofing your current career, rather than heading down a completely separate career path.

Put simply, upskilling should be about augmenting the skills you already have. And every new skill opens up doorways, ultimately making you more adaptable, resilient and employable.

This has never been more important. With the global impact of the pandemic on the jobs market still ongoing, we’ve seen a huge increase in online learning. The pandemic has hastened digital transformation efforts across sectors. Employees have to ensure they have the new skills that companies need in a world that has changed significantly in the past year.

It’s important to not make the decision in isolation. However, if a learner establishes that a course really isn’t right, there is no harm in them stopping or switching to an alternative.

Learners often pick up transferable skills during courses and core concept knowledge tends to transfer well horizontally. If possible, it’s sensible to finish any modules they are in the middle of executing in order to be able to refer to it as a proof of the skills acquired up until that point.

For people who are nervous about upskilling or reskilling, what advice would you give them?

It can be daunting starting from scratch, and it can be dispiriting being in a position where you may feel your learning at work has plateaued.

Help should always be at hand. We always encourage employees to speak to their managers or HR departments about upskilling or reskilling initiatives. Where funding is concerned, many companies also offer reimbursement. The hardest part of any learning journey is making the leap to get started.

More broadly, be patient, curious and open-minded. You’ll likely be inspired by the opportunity to become an expert in a whole new area or to hone the skills you already have established to an even greater depth.

Source link


Google delays execution of deprecated Chrome extensions • The Register

Voice Of EU



Google has delayed its browser extension platform transition for enterprise customers, giving those using managed versions of Chrome with the deprecated Manifest v2 (MV2) extensions an extra six months of support.

The Chocolate Factory has also redefined its deadlines for general Chrome users to make the transition to the new platform, called Manifest v3 (MV3), less of a shock to the system.

“Chrome will take a gradual and experimental approach to turning off Manifest V2 to ensure a smooth end-user experience during the phase-out process,” explained David Li, a product manager at Google, in a blog post. “We would like to make sure developers have the information they need, with plenty of time to transition to the new manifest version and to roll out changes to their users.”

Chrome will take a gradual and experimental approach to turning off Manifest V2 to ensure a smooth end-user experience

Developers, in other words, need more time to rewrite their extension code.

Previously, as of January 2023, Chrome was to stop running MV2 extensions. Enterprise managed Chrome installations had an extra six months with MV2, until June 2023.

The current schedule says MV2 extensions may or may not work in developer-oriented versions of Chrome used outside of enterprises. “Starting in Chrome 112, Chrome may run experiments to turn off support for Manifest V2 extensions in Canary, Dev, and Beta channels,” the timeline says.

And then in June 2023, MV2 extensions may or may not get disabled in any version of Chrome, including the Stable channel used by most people.

New MV2 extensions could no longer be added to the Chrome Web Store in June 2022, and that remains unchanged under the new roadmap; MV2 extensions already available the Chrome Web Store can still be downloaded and can still receive updates.

As of June 2023, MV2 extensions will no longer be visible in the store (so they can’t be newly installed, but can still be updated for existing users).

Come January 2024, nothing will be left to chance: the Chrome Web Store will stop accepting updates to MV2 extensions, all MV2 extensions will be removed from the store, and the MV2 usage in enterprises will end.

Li suggests developers make the transition sooner rather than later “because those [MV2] extensions may stop working at any time following the aforementioned dates.”

In recognition of the confusion among developers trying to adapt their extensions to MV3, Li said Google has implemented new APIs and platform improvements and has created a progress page to provide more transparency with regard to the state of MV2-MV3 transition.

Since 2018, Google has been revising the code that defines what browser extensions can do in Chrome. Its outgoing architecture known as Manifest v2 proved too powerful – it could be used by rogue add-ons to steal data, for example – and Google claimed use of those capabilities hindered browser performance. Critics like the EFF have disputed that.

Coincidentally, those capabilities, particularly the ability to intercept and revise network requests based on dynamic criteria, made Manifest v2 useful for blocking content and privacy-violating tracking scripts.

Under the new Manifest v3 regime, extensions have been domesticated. As a result, they appear to use computing resources more efficiently while being less effective at content blocking.

Illustration of the Facebook logo surrounded by thumbs down

Facebook is one bad Chrome extension away from another Cambridge Analytica scandal


Whether or not this results in meaningful performance improvement, the MV3 change has been championed by Google for Chrome and the open source Chromium project, and is being supported by those building atop Chromium, like Microsoft Edge, as well as Apple’s WebKit-based Safari and Mozilla’s Gecko-based Firefox.

However, Brave, Mozilla, and Vivadi have said they intend to continue supporting Manifest v2 extensions for an indeterminate amount of time. How long that will last is anyone’s guess.

Brave, like other privacy-oriented companies and advocacy groups, has made it clear this regime change is not to its liking. “With Manifest V3, Google is harming privacy and limiting user choice,” the developer said via Twitter. “The bottom line, though, is that Brave will still continue to offer leading protection against invasive ads and trackers.”

With Manifest V3, Google is harming privacy and limiting user choice

Google, on its timeline, suggests MV3 is approaching “full feature parity with Manifest V2.”

Extension developers appear to be skeptical about that. On Friday, in response to Google’s timeline revision posted to the Chromium Extension Google Group, a developer forum member who goes by the pseudonym “wOxxOm” slammed Google for posts full of corporate lingo about safety and security and pushed back against its statement about feature parity.

“[T]his definitely sounds reasonable if you don’t know the context, but given the subsequently plotted timeline it becomes a gross exaggeration and a borderline lie, because with the progress rate we all observed over the past years it’ll take at least several years more for MV3 to become reliable and feature-rich enough to replace MV2, not half a year or a year,” wOxxOm posted.

“Neither the issue list nor the announcement acknowledge that MV3 is still half-broken and unusable for anything other than a beta test due to its unreliable registration of service workers that break extensions completely for thousands of users, soon for millions because no one in Chromium has yet found out the exact reason of the bug, hence they can’t be sure they’ll fix it in the next months.”

This may not be the last time Google revises its transition timeline. ®

Source link

Continue Reading


Irish Research Council pumps €27m to fund next generation of researchers

Voice Of EU



A total of 316 awardees of the IRC’s Government of Ireland programme will receive funding to conduct ‘pioneering’ research.

Postgraduate and postdoctoral researchers in Ireland are set to get €27m in funding from the Irish Research Council (IRC) through its flagship Government of Ireland programme.

In an announcement today (30 September), the IRC said that a total of 316 Government of Ireland awards will be given to researchers in the country, including 239 postgraduate scholarships and 77 postdoctoral fellowships.

Awardees under the scheme will conduct research on a broad range of topics, from machine translation and social media to protecting wild bee populations and bioplastics.

“The prestigious awards recognise and fund pioneering research projects along with addressing new and emerging fields of research that introduce creative and innovative approaches across all disciplines, including the sciences, humanities and the arts,” said IRC director Louise Callinan.


One of the science-focused postgraduate awardees, University of Galway’s Cherrelle Johnson, is working on the long-term sustainability of bioplastics as an alternative to fossil fuel-based plastics.

Another, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland’s Tammy Strickland, is studying the role of the circadian rhythm, or the sleep-wake cycle, of immune cells in the brain in epilepsy.

Khetam Al Sharou of Dublin City University, one of the postdoctoral researchers to win the award, is looking into the use of machine translation in social media and the associated risks of information distortion.

Meanwhile, Robert Brose from the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies is investigating the particles and radiation that are emitted by high-energy sources in our milky way to try and find the most likely sources of life.

Diana Carolina Pimentel Betancurt from Teagasc, the state agency providing research and development in agriculture and related fields, is looking for natural probiotics in native honeybees to mitigate the effect of pesticides.

“Funding schemes like the IRC’s Government of Ireland programmes are vitally important to the wider research landscape in Ireland, as they ensure that researchers are supported at an early stage of their career and are given an opportunity to direct their own research,” Callinan said.

53 early-career researchers across Ireland got €28.5m in funding last month from the SFI-IRC Pathway programme, a new collaborative initiative between Science Foundation Ireland and the IRC. SFI and IRC are expected to merge to form one funding body in the coming years.

10 things you need to know direct to your inbox every weekday. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of essential sci-tech news.

Source link

Continue Reading


Molly Russell died while suffering from effects of online content, coroner says | Internet safety

Voice Of EU



Molly Russell, 14, died as a result of self-harm when she had depression and was suffering from the “negative effects of online content”, a coroner has ruled.

The senior coroner Andrew Walker made his ruling as an inquest into the teenager’s death came to a conclusion at north London coroner’s court on Friday. The inquest had heard that Molly, from Harrow, north-west London, had interacted with large amounts of harmful social media content in the final months of her life.

The two-week inquest focused on Molly’s use of Instagram and Pinterest. Executives at both US-based companies gave evidence at the hearing, which showed how Molly had viewed graphic content in the months before she killed herself in November 2017.

Concluding it would not be safe to rule Molly’s cause of death as suicide, Walker said some of the sites viewed by her were “not safe” because they allowed access to adult content that should not have been available to a 14-year-old.

“It is likely that the above material viewed by Molly, already suffering with a depressive illness and vulnerable due to her age, affected her in a negative way and contributed to her death in a more than minimal way,” said Walker, delivering his findings of fact at the inquest.

In his conclusion, he said Molly “died from an act of self-harm whilst suffering from depression and the negative effects of online content”.

Speaking outside the court, Molly’s father, Ian Russell, 59, said: “In the last week we have heard much about one tragic story – Molly’s story. Sadly, there are too many others similarly affected right now.

“At this point I just want to say, however dark it seems, there is always hope. And if you’re struggling, please speak to someone you trust or one of the many wonderful support organisations rather than engage with online content that may be harmful. Please do what you can to live long and stay strong.”

Molly viewed more than 16,000 pieces of content on Instagram in the final six months of her life, of which 2,100 were related to suicide, self-harm and depression. The inquest also heard how she had compiled a digital pinboard on Pinterest with 469 images related to similar subjects.

Elizabeth Lagone, the head of health and wellbeing policy at Meta, the owner of Instagram and Facebook, apologised and admitted Molly had viewed posts that violated its content policies.

A senior Pinterest executive also apologised for the platform showing inappropriate content and acknowledged that the platform was not safe at the time Molly was on it.

The inquest heard evidence from a child psychiatrist, Dr Navin Venugopal, who said Molly had been “placed at risk” by the content she had viewed. The headteacher at Molly’s secondary school also gave evidence, describing how it was “almost impossible” to keep track of the risks posed to pupils by social media.

The chief executive of the child protection charity the NSPCC, Sir Peter Wanless, said: “The ruling should send shock waves through Silicon Valley. Tech companies must expect to be held to account when they put the safety of children second to commercial decisions. The magnitude of this moment for children everywhere cannot be overstated.”

The Russell family have become prominent campaigners for internet safety since Molly’s death and attended the inquest throughout.

In a pen portrait of his daughter that opened the inquest, Molly’s father paid tribute to a girl “full of love and hope and happiness”. He said she had been “struggling with her mental health and hiding her struggles from the rest of us while she battled her demons in the hope of finding peace”.

He added: “It is ‘OK not to be OK’ and … it is important to talk to someone trained or qualified whenever it is needed.”

Source link

Continue Reading


Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates 
directly on your inbox.

You have Successfully Subscribed!