Connect with us


‘The Morning Show’, Or The Survival Of Autoimmune Journalism

Each new season of The Morning Show (AppleTV), the series that brought together Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon —who were sisters in Friends, don’t forget, while now they are sometimes friends, sometimes enemies— appears before the viewer like a shaky building waiting to be built. And this is because the risk it runs, each time, is enormous. It is not easy to deal with journalism from the inside, and to do it, furthermore, with a documentary value that began in an improvised way: at the beginning it was just a matter of placing a bomb on a live morning show, the discovery that its host, Mitch Kessler ( a not always convincing Steve Carell) had been a sexual predator from the beginning and ended up becoming the driving force, in the background, of each new installment. Or isn’t it still the series that has most truthfully dealt with the pandemic without exactly focusing on it?

From a powerfully ambitious modesty — the series is aware that it is treating the world from the apparent frivolity of a morning show full of ridiculous advice and papier-mâché celebrities — The Morning Show impeccably portrayed the sexual offender in his work environment, the harasser who is protected and consented to by his colleagues, surrounded by sentimental corpses — women destroyed by the abuse of power, and their conversion into mere toys with no more value than the use he wants to make of them, like Hannah Shoenfeld, the young producer who is at the center of the first season although from a well-calculated second plane: the real victim is still so afraid that she even hides in the plot. A dizzying tug of war between the old world and the new world is settled, in the final episode, by the main characters.

The stars are, of course, Aniston and Witherspoon. The first plays a narcissistic television legend, Alex Levy, who was never completely comfortable in the old world, but who didn’t care because, as she herself says, “she was successful” and that was the only thing that mattered to her. Witherspoon plays an intrepid southern reporter with identity problems – she finds it difficult to recognize her sexuality – and a hyper-dysfunctional family (an alcoholic father, an addicted brother, a cruel and ruthless mother) who, above all, seeks the truth, that is, to be fair to the moment and to the people around her. After starring in a spectacular attack on the company itself at the end of the first season, in the second, one has left television to write her memoirs in an idyllic cabin in Maine, while the other is about to become news herself for her affair with another famous anchor.

It seemed difficult to create the building of that second season, with Kessler himself (Carell) out of action in Italy, but thanks to the aforementioned documentary value of the format, which included a shocking opening sequence with New York looking completely empty during the coronavirus pandemic —a drone flight that brings back something that, today, seems to have happened in a parallel reality— and addressing the pandemic from the onset with a special correspondent to Wuhan whom no one takes seriously at first. The end-of-the-world feeling that flutters throughout the season —knowing as we know how the pandemic ended, and how during the first months it was not given the importance it was going to have — perfectly captures the moment, doing what journalism does with reality through fiction: capture it.

Vulnerabilities and punishments

In the middle, Levy, still fearful of what her past could cost her in the present—an opportunistic journalist is about to publish a book in which she plans to uncover the intermittent relationship that existed between her and the predator Mitch Kessler—begins to shed her unbearable narcissism, allows herself to let her guard down, become someone else and ask for forgiveness, while Bradley Jackson (Witherspoon) discovers how vulnerable a woman can be in a place of power like the one she occupies, taking the opposite path as her partenaire—in the interpretive duel, Aniston stands almost as a force of nature—and trying to protect herself without success. There is an implicit punishment in success, warns Julianna Margulies, playing Laura Peterson, another famous morning host, with whom Jackson has just begun a relationship.

Tig Notaro and Jon Hamm, the great discovery of the third season.
Tig Notaro and Jon Hamm, the great discovery of the third season.

The relationship meant a public outing for Jackson before she could do it for herself, and in this third season it becomes one of the threads to pull on to put the building back on its feet. The casting of Jon Hamm in the role of Paul Marks, a kind of desirable Elon Musk determined to buy the company — and with it, Aniston and Witherspoon, and their entire history —introduces the beginning of the end of the importance of television, and of news in the old format. The lack of control over a present in which privacy does not exist — and what little remains of it can end up hijacked in a cyberattack capable of erasing you and your credibility from the map — precipitates the possibility of a future in which journalism barely survives its own autoimmune disease.

Billy Crudup (a superb Cory Ellison, the charming two-faced tycoon who may try to bring you down or rescue you with the sole purpose of staying afloat) said it at one point in the first season: “What we are fighting is a battle for the soul of the universe.” Under the mechanism of fiction, The Morning Show is showing how human beings are trying to redirect the ship and how the system they have created is acting as a storm that prevents them from doing so. “They are not earthquakes, they are people,” says at another point one of the network’s directors, Cybil Reynolds (Holland Taylor), demanding that the destruction they cause be avoided in time, but forgetting that the environment in which it moves — that of information—is agonizing over its own medicine, which it still believes can save it: the disease of clickbait.


Assessing Property Size: What Square Footage Can You Get With The Average UK House Price In Your Area?

Assessing Property Size In The UK

In the United Kingdom, there is a prevailing tendency to gauge the size of residences based on the number of bedrooms rather than square footage. In fact, research indicates that three out of five individuals are unaware of the square footage of their property.

However, a comprehensive analysis conducted by Savills reveals significant variations in property sizes throughout the country. For instance, with the average property price standing at £340,837, this amount would typically afford a studio flat spanning 551 square feet in London, according to the prominent estate agency.

Conversely, in the North East region, the same sum would secure a spacious five-bedroom house measuring 1,955 square feet, nearly four times the size of a comparable property in London.

Best value: Heading to the North East of England is where buyers will get the most from their money

In Scotland, the median house price equates to a sizable investment capable of procuring a generous four-bedroom residence spanning 1,743 square feet. Conversely, in Wales, Yorkshire & The Humber, and the North West, this sum affords a slightly smaller four-bedroom dwelling of approximately 1,500 square feet, while in the East and West Midlands, it accommodates a 1,300 square foot home. In stark contrast, within the South West, £340,837 secures a modest 1,000 square foot property, and in the East, an even more confined 928 square feet.

London presents the most challenging market, where this budget offers the least purchasing power. Following closely, the South East allows for 825 square feet of space or a medium-sized two-bedroom dwelling. Lucian Cook, head of residential research at Savills, emphasizes the profound disparity in purchasing potential across Britain, ranging from compact studio flats in London to spacious four or five-bedroom residences in parts of North East England.

While square footage serves as a critical metric, with a significant portion of Britons unfamiliar with their property’s dimensions, the number of bedrooms remains a traditional indicator of size. Personal preferences, such as a preference for larger kitchens, may influence property selection. For those prioritizing ample space, Easington, County Durham, offers a substantial 2,858 square foot, five-bedroom home, while Rhondda, Wales, and Na h-Eileanan an Iar, Scotland, provide 2,625 and 2,551 square feet, respectively. Conversely, in St Albans, Hertfordshire, £340,837 secures a mere 547 square feet, equivalent to a one-bedroom flat.

The disparity continues in central London, where purchasing power diminishes considerably. In Kensington, the budget accommodates a mere 220 square feet, contrasting with the slightly more spacious 236 square feet in Westminster. Conversely, in Dagenham, the same investment translates to 770 square feet. Three properties currently listed on Rightmove exemplify the diversity within this price range across the UK market.

South of the river: This semi-detached house is located near to three different train stations

South of the river: This semi-detached house is located near to three different train stations

2. Lewisham: One-bed house, £345,000

This one-bedroom property in Lewisham, South London, is on the market for £345,000.

The semi-detached house is set over two floors, and has a private patio.

The property is located near to bus links and amenities, as well as Catford train station.

Edinburgh fringe: This three-bed property is located on the edge of the city, near to the town of Musselburgh

Edinburgh fringe: This three-bed property is located on the edge of the city, near to the town of Musselburgh

3. Edinburgh: Three-bed house, £350,000

This three-bedroom detached house in Edinburgh could be yours for £350,000.

The house, which has a two-car driveway, boasts a large kitchen diner, and is within easy reach of Newcriaghall train station.

Continue Reading


Top 10 Florida Cities Dominate The Business Startup Landscape In The U.S.

Top 10 Florida Cities And Business Startup Landscape In The U.S.

The Voice Of EU | Florida emerges as a hub for entrepreneurial endeavors, with its vibrant business landscape and conducive environment for startups. Renowned for its low corporate tax rates and a high concentration of investors, the Sunshine State beckons aspiring entrepreneurs seeking fertile grounds to launch and grow their businesses.

In a recent report by WalletHub, Florida cities dominate the list of the top 10 best destinations for business startups, showcasing their resilience and economic vitality amidst challenging times.

From Orlando’s thriving market to Miami’s dynamic ecosystem, each city offers unique advantages and opportunities for entrepreneurial success. Let’s delve into the chronologically listed cities that exemplify Florida’s prominence in the business startup arena.

1. Orlando Leads the Way: Orlando emerges as the most attractive market in the U.S. for business startups, with a remarkable surge in small business establishments. WalletHub’s latest report highlights Orlando’s robust ecosystem, fostering the survival and growth of startups, buoyed by a high concentration of investors per capita.

2. Tampa Takes Second Place: Securing the second spot among large cities for business startups, Tampa boasts a favorable business environment attributed to its low corporate tax rates. The city’s ample investor presence further fortifies startups, providing essential resources for navigating the initial years of business operations.

3. Charlotte’s Diverse Industries: Claiming the third position, Charlotte stands out for its diverse industrial landscape and exceptionally low corporate taxes, enticing companies to reinvest capital. This conducive environment propels entrepreneurial endeavors, contributing to sustained economic growth.

4. Jacksonville’s Rising Profile: Jacksonville emerges as a promising destination for startups, bolstered by its favorable business climate. The city’s strategic positioning fosters entrepreneurial ventures, attracting aspiring business owners seeking growth opportunities.

5. Miami’s Entrepreneurial Hub: Miami solidifies its position as a thriving entrepreneurial hub, attracting businesses with its dynamic ecosystem and strategic location. The city’s vibrant startup culture and supportive infrastructure make it an appealing destination for ventures of all sizes.

6. Atlanta’s Economic Momentum: Atlanta’s ascent in the business startup landscape underscores its economic momentum and favorable business conditions. The city’s strategic advantages and conducive policies provide a fertile ground for entrepreneurial ventures to flourish.

7. Fort Worth’s Business-Friendly Environment: Fort Worth emerges as a prime destination for startups, offering a business-friendly environment characterized by low corporate taxes. The city’s supportive ecosystem and strategic initiatives facilitate the growth and success of new ventures.

8. Austin’s Innovation Hub: Austin cements its status as an innovation hub, attracting startups with its vibrant entrepreneurial community and progressive policies. The city’s robust infrastructure and access to capital foster a conducive environment for business growth and innovation.

9. Durham’s Emerging Entrepreneurship Scene: Durham’s burgeoning entrepreneurship scene positions it as a promising destination for startups, fueled by its supportive ecosystem and strategic initiatives. The city’s collaborative culture and access to resources contribute to the success of new ventures.

10. St. Petersburg’s Thriving Business Community: St. Petersburg rounds off the top 10 with its thriving business community and supportive ecosystem for startups. The city’s strategic advantages and favorable business climate make it an attractive destination for entrepreneurial endeavors.

Despite unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Great Resignation, and high inflation, these top Florida cities remain resilient and well-equipped to overcome obstacles, offering promising opportunities for business owners and entrepreneurs alike.

Continue Reading


European Startup Ecosystems Awash With Gulf Investment – Here Are Some Of The Top Investors

European Startup Ecosystem Getting Flooded With Gulf Investments

The Voice Of EU | In recent years, European entrepreneurs seeking capital infusion have widened their horizons beyond the traditional American investors, increasingly turning their gaze towards the lucrative investment landscape of the Gulf region. With substantial capital reservoirs nestled within sovereign wealth funds and corporate venture capital entities, Gulf nations have emerged as compelling investors for European startups and scaleups.

According to comprehensive data from Dealroom, the influx of investment from Gulf countries into European startups soared to a staggering $3 billion in 2023, marking a remarkable 5x surge from the $627 million recorded in 2018.

This substantial injection of capital, accounting for approximately 5% of the total funding raised in the region, underscores the growing prominence of Gulf investors in European markets.

Particularly noteworthy is the significant support extended to growth-stage companies, with over two-thirds of Gulf investments in 2023 being directed towards funding rounds exceeding $100 million. This influx of capital provides a welcome boost to European companies grappling with the challenge of securing well-capitalized investors locally.

Delving deeper into the landscape, Sifted has identified the most active Gulf investors in European startups over the past two years.

Leading the pack is Aramco Ventures, headquartered in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Bolstered by a substantial commitment, Aramco Ventures boasts a $1.5 billion sustainability fund, alongside an additional $4 billion allocated to its venture capital arm, positioning it as a formidable player with a total investment capacity of $7 billion by 2027. With a notable presence in 17 funding rounds, Aramco Ventures has strategically invested in ventures such as Carbon Clean Solutions and ANYbotics, aligning with its focus on businesses that offer strategic value.

Following closely is Mubadala Capital, headquartered in Abu Dhabi, UAE, with an impressive tally of 13 investments in European startups over the past two years. Backed by the sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investment Company, Mubadala Capital’s diverse investment portfolio spans private equity, venture capital, and alternative solutions. Notable investments include Klarna, TIER, and Juni, reflecting its global investment strategy across various sectors.

Ventura Capital, based in Dubai, UAE, secured its position as a key player with nine investments in European startups. With a presence in Dubai, London, and Tokyo, Ventura Capital boasts an international network of limited partners and a sector-agnostic investment approach, contributing to its noteworthy investments in companies such as Coursera and Spotify.

Qatar Investment Authority, headquartered in Doha, Qatar, has made significant inroads into the European startup ecosystem with six notable investments. As the sovereign wealth fund of Qatar, QIA’s diversified portfolio spans private and public equity, infrastructure, and real estate, with strategic investments in tech startups across healthcare, consumer, and industrial sectors.

MetaVision Dubai, a newcomer to the scene, has swiftly garnered attention with six investments in European startups. Focusing on seed to Series A startups in the metaverse and Web3 space, MetaVision raised an undisclosed fund in 2022, affirming its commitment to emerging technologies and innovative ventures.

Investcorp, headquartered in Manama, Bahrain, has solidified its presence with six investments in European startups. With a focus on mid-sized B2B businesses, Investcorp’s diverse investment strategies encompass private equity, real estate, infrastructure, and credit management, contributing to its notable investments in companies such as Terra Quantum and TruKKer.

Chimera Capital, based in Abu Dhabi, UAE, rounds off the list with four strategic investments in European startups. As part of a prominent business conglomerate, Chimera Capital leverages its global reach and sector-agnostic approach to drive investments in ventures such as CMR Surgical and Neat Burger.

In conclusion, the burgeoning influx of capital from Gulf investors into European startups underscores the region’s growing appeal as a vibrant hub for innovation and entrepreneurship. With key players such as Aramco Ventures, Mubadala Capital, and Ventura Capital leading the charge, European startups are poised to benefit from the strategic investments and partnerships forged with Gulf investors, propelling them towards sustained growth and success in the global market landscape.

We Can’t Thank You Enough For Your Support!

— By Darren Wilson, Team

— Contact us:

— Anonymous submissions:

Continue Reading


Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates 
directly on your inbox.

You have Successfully Subscribed!