Connect with us

Global Affairs

From university to Ukraine’s defense force: ‘I have to help protect my country against Russian terrorists’ | International

A month ago, Lev Tiskin used to spend his time playing video games online and went out almost every weekend to have a drink with his friends. The 18-year-old had recently started his freshman year in business school at university, and was dreaming about spending the spring break somewhere warm at the beach. Today, the slight young man with gray-blue eyes is carrying a backpack over his shoulder with a few changes of clothes and lining up with dozens of people in a government building in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro. He is waiting to receive instructions – perhaps a weapon too – and will then leave for his assigned destination to defend the city. “I have to help protect my country against Russian terrorists,” he says.

As Russia intensifies its offensive against Ukraine and puts its nuclear deterrence forces on alert, thousands of citizens across the country have rolled up their sleeves and joined territorial defense forces, volunteer battalions and protection groups. They are preparing for total war. The troops sent by Russian President Vladimir Putin – which have invaded from three flanks (north, east and south) and are striking by land, sea and air – have encountered resistance not only from the Ukrainian army, which is trying to contain their advance, but also from civilian groups that, with or without weapons, are trying to protect their cities and towns and repel a force that has double the numbers and the power of Ukraine. In seven days of war, Moscow has not yet taken any major city, although it is escalating its attacks on Kyiv, Kharkiv and Kherson.

In Dnipro, where armed soldiers guard almost all city entrances, volunteers are deploying tank traps and sandbags. Russian troops have not yet reached this city of one million people, which has a Russian-speaking majority and a large Jewish community. But as the missile strikes intensify, the sound of air raid sirens has been ringing in the air.

An alarm goes off near a park, where Tiskin and his friends are waiting. The message is clear: “Run for cover.” Floods of people run to huddle against the walls of a nearby building or curl up to the ground. Recruitment points are key strike targets. Not so long ago, Tiskin said he was “a little scared,” now, he admits he is frightened. “My parents didn’t approve at all. They tried to stop me [signing up as a volunteer fighter], but I came anyway. I have to do something. If not, in a few days there might not be any Ukraine left,” he says.

(l-r) Danil, Danil, Lev and Sascha, 18-year-olds who have signed up to join Ukraine‘s territorial defense forces.
(l-r) Danil, Danil, Lev and Sascha, 18-year-olds who have signed up to join Ukraine‘s territorial defense forces.M. S. R.

Olga, dressed in a gray tracksuit with a blue jacket, has just received a firearm. “I have always been a pacifist, but now I must protect my own,” she says. Olga is 33, and has a nine-year-old son. She is an economist and works in an accounting firm. She enlisted when Russia sent tens of thousands of troops to the Ukrainian border, and Ukraine’s Defense Ministry began organizing territorial defense forces. Learning how to apply tourniquets and first aid basics was more for protection than for safety. “I thought it wouldn’t be necessary in the end, but this is no drill,” she says. She is certain that she will apply all her knowledge without hesitation: “It’s a nightmare. Putin is coming for us. And then he will go after Europe.”

Now, Olga is waiting for a car to take her to defend a target she can’t reveal. The territorial defense forces, defined by the Defense Ministry as a tool of “resistance” to deter Russia, are assigned with protecting basic infrastructure such as bridges, roads and tunnels. The economist likes this concept of resistance. She says that everyone she knows is ready to help defend Ukraine. “Putin is an idiot. This has united us even more, if possible. Ukraine will pass this test and come out stronger, with honor,” she says.

Online tutorials to prepare Molotov cocktails

When Putin announced a “special military operation” in the Donbas region to “denazify” Ukraine – an offensive that in fact has evolved into open war in the entire country – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy called on the population to remain calm and resist. After a day of attacks on strategic infrastructure and the siege of key cities such as Kyiv and Kharkiv, Zelenskiy called on civilians to help defend the country in any way possible. For the dozens of people who have gathered in a square in Dnipro, that means making Molotov cocktails. To make the homemade bombs, the group is cutting polystyrene strips and filling up beer bottles with flammable liquid. Meanwhile, other volunteers in the square are packing boxes, organizing supplies and loading the improvised weapon onto cars.

Natalia learned two days ago how to make a Molotov cocktail by following instructions she found online. But today in Ukraine, several media organizations and even radio stations are instructing civilians on how to prepare the bombs. Natalia (who prefers to go by just her first name) says she has not thought – and prefers not to think – about the possibility of having to use them. Doing so would mean that Dnipro is under siege by Russian troops. According to the Ukrainian government, Russian combatants have infiltrated cities throughout the country and are ready to act at any moment. “I contribute more by doing organizational tasks,” says the 37-year-old engineer. “But I’m prepared to fight for my life. And if that means throwing a bomb at a tank or someone, I’ll do it.”

Natalia prepares a Molotov cocktail in Dnipro.
Natalia prepares a Molotov cocktail in Dnipro.M. R. S.

In 2014, when Russia invaded and subsequently annexed Crimea with an illegal referendum and the war in the Donbas region broke out against Moscow-backed pro-Russian separatists, Kyiv was already using volunteer battalions to help shore up its disorganized and ill-equipped army. Back then, these paramilitary groups – some of which had clear links to right-wing extremism and neo-Nazi ideology – came to fight in the east.

The situation is different now. Most of these paramilitary groups were turned into a unit within the Ukrainian army. The mobilization that is now being seen in Dnipro and most Ukrainian cities looks more like civil resistance, with volunteers bringing food to soldiers, donating blood for the wounded, setting up barricades, maintaining the curfew, organizing cyber-surveillance groups and joining the territorial defense forces.

There are no spots left in the defense battalion that Alexander Klasko has joined. All the positions have been filled and now are turning people away, says the 57-year-old driver. A veteran of the Afghan war, he fought in Kabul and Kandahar in 1982. With a firearm over his shoulder, he explains that he enlisted just after Putin launched the invasion because he thought his military experience could be useful. “What can I say, war is war, but this is our home and we can’t let anyone in without our permission.”

Source link

Current

Congratulations, Privacy Just Took A Great Leap Out the Window!

Your Data Is Being Used Without Your Permission And Knowledge

The Voice Of EU | In the heart of technological innovation, the collision between intellectual property rights and the development of cutting-edge AI technologies has sparked a significant legal battle. The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, filing a lawsuit in Manhattan federal court. This legal maneuver aims to address concerns surrounding the unauthorized use of the Times’ content for the training of AI models, alleging copyright infringements that could potentially result in billions of dollars in damages.

READ: HOW YOUR DATA IS BEING USED TO TRAIN A.I.

This legal tussle underlines the escalating tension between technological advancements and the protection of intellectual property. The crux of the lawsuit revolves around OpenAI and Microsoft allegedly utilizing the Times’ proprietary content to advance their own AI technology, directly competing with the publication’s services. The lawsuit suggests that this unauthorized utilization threatens the Times’ ability to offer its distinctive service and impacts its AI innovation, creating a competitive landscape that challenges the publication’s proprietary content.

Amidst the growing digital landscape, media organizations like the Times are confronting a myriad of challenges. The migration of readers to online platforms has significantly impacted traditional media, and the advent of artificial intelligence technology has added another layer of complexity. The legal dispute brings to the forefront the contentious practice of AI companies scraping copyrighted information from online sources, including articles from media organizations, to train their generative AI chatbots. This strategy has attracted substantial investments, rapidly transforming the AI landscape.

Exhibit presented by the New York Times’ legal team of ChatGPT replicating a article after being prompted

The lawsuit highlights instances where OpenAI’s technology, specifically GPT-4, replicated significant portions of Times articles, including in-depth investigative reports. These outputs, alleged by the Times to contain verbatim excerpts from their content, raise concerns about the ethical and legal boundaries of using copyrighted material for AI model training without proper authorization or compensation.

The legal action taken by the Times follows attempts to engage in discussions with Microsoft and OpenAI, aiming to address concerns about the use of its intellectual property. Despite these efforts, negotiations failed to reach a resolution that would ensure fair compensation for the use of the Times’ content while promoting responsible AI development that benefits society.

In the midst of this legal battle, the broader questions surrounding the responsible and ethical utilization of copyrighted material in advancing technological innovations come to the forefront.

The dispute between the Times, OpenAI, and Microsoft serves as a significant case study in navigating the intricate intersection of technological progress and safeguarding intellectual property rights in the digital age.


Continue Reading

Culture

Conflicted History: ‘Oppenheimer’ And Its Impact On Los Alamos And New Mexico Downwinders

‘Oppenheimer’ And Its Impact On Los Alamos And New Mexico Downwinders

The Voice Of EU | In the highly anticipated blockbuster movie, “Oppenheimer,” the life of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the man behind the first atomic bomb, is portrayed as a riveting tale of triumph and tragedy.

As the film takes center stage, it also brings to light the often-overlooked impacts on a community living downwind from the top-secret Manhattan Project testing site in southern New Mexico.

A Forgotten Legacy

While the film industry and critics praise “Oppenheimer,” a sense of frustration prevails among the residents of New Mexico’s Tularosa Basin, who continue to grapple with the consequences of the Manhattan Project. Tina Cordova, a cancer survivor and founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, expresses their feelings, stating, “They invaded our lives and our lands and then they left,” referring to the scientists and military personnel who conducted secret experiments over 200 miles away from their community.

The Consortium, alongside organizations like the Union of Concerned Scientists, has been striving to raise awareness about the impact of the Manhattan Project on New Mexico’s population. Advocates emphasize the necessity of acknowledging the human cost of the Trinity Test, the first atomic blast, and other nuclear weapons activities that have affected countless lives in the state.

The Ongoing Struggle for Recognition

As film enthusiasts celebrate the drama and brilliance of “Oppenheimer,” New Mexico downwinders feel overlooked by both the U.S. government and movie producers. The federal government’s compensation program for radiation exposure still does not include these affected individuals. The government’s selection of the remote and flat Trinity Test Site, without warning residents in the surrounding areas, further added to the controversy.

Living off the land, the rural population in the Tularosa Basin had no idea that the fine ash settling on their homes and fields was a result of the world’s first atomic explosion.

The government initially attempted to cover up the incident, attributing the bright light and rumble to an explosion at a munitions dump. It was only after the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Japan weeks later that New Mexico residents realized the magnitude of what they had witnessed.

Tracing the Fallout

According to the Manhattan Project National Historical Park, large amounts of radiation were released into the atmosphere during the Trinity Test, with fallout descending over a vast area. Some of the fallout reached as far as the Atlantic Ocean, but the greatest concentration settled approximately 30 miles from the test site.

Now I Am Become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds.

J. Robert Oppenheimer

The consequences of this catastrophic event have affected generations of New Mexicans, who still await recognition and justice for the harm caused by nuclear weapons.

A Tale of Contrasts: Los Alamos and the Legacy of Oppenheimer

As the film’s spotlight shines on the life of J. Robert Oppenheimer, a contrasting narrative unfolds in Los Alamos, more than 200 miles north of the Tularosa Basin. Los Alamos stands as a symbol of Oppenheimer’s legacy, housing one of the nation’s premier national laboratories and boasting the highest percentage of people with doctorate degrees in the U.S.

Oppenheimer’s influence is evident throughout Los Alamos, with a street bearing his name and an IPA named in his honor at a local brewery. The city embraces its scientific legacy, showcasing his handwritten notes and ID card in a museum exhibit. Los Alamos National Laboratory employees played a significant role in the film, contributing as extras and engaging in enlightening discussions during breaks.

The “Oppenheimer” Movie

Director Christopher Nolan’s perspective on the Trinity Test and its profound impact is evident in his approach to “Oppenheimer.” He has described the event as an extraordinary moment in human history and expressed his desire to immerse the audience in the pivotal moment when the button was pushed. Nolan’s dedication to bringing historical accuracy and emotional depth to the screen is evident as he draws inspiration from Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin’s Pulitzer Prize-winning book, “American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer.

For Nolan, Oppenheimer’s story is a potent blend of dreams and nightmares, capturing the complexity and consequences of the Manhattan Project. As the film reaches global audiences, it also offers a unique opportunity to raise awareness about the downwinders in New Mexico, whose lives were forever altered by the legacy of nuclear weapons testing.

The Oppenheimer Festival and Beyond

Los Alamos is determined to use the Oppenheimer Festival as an opportunity to educate visitors about the true stories behind the film’s events. The county’s “Project Oppenheimer” initiative, launched in early 2023, encompasses forums, documentaries, art installations, and exhibits that delve into the scientific contributions of the laboratory and the social implications of the Manhattan Project.

A special area during the festival will facilitate discussions about the movie, fostering a deeper understanding of the community’s history. The county aims to continue revisiting and discussing the legacy of the Manhattan Project, ensuring that the impact of this pivotal moment in history is never forgotten.

As “Oppenheimer” takes audiences on an emotional journey, it serves as a reminder that every historical event carries with it complex and multifaceted implications. The movie may celebrate the scientific achievements of the past, but it also illuminates the urgent need to recognize and address the human cost that persists to this day.


We Can’t Thank You Enough For Your Support!

— By Team VoiceOfEU.com

— For Info.: info@VoiceOfEU.com

— Anonymous Submissions: press@VoiceOfEU.com


Continue Reading

Current

GSK’s Mosquirix Is Revolutionizing The Fight Against Malaria

GSK’s Mosquirix And The Fight Against Malaria

Over the past three years, the global focus has primarily been on the Covid-19 pandemic, diverting attention and resources away from other infectious diseases that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations in the Global South. Among these diseases, malaria continues to be a pressing public health concern, claiming the lives of hundreds of thousands of people each year, especially children in Sub-Saharan Africa. While significant progress has been made in preventing and treating malaria, innovative solutions are needed to combat this deadly disease.

Advancements in Malaria Prevention:

Researchers have made remarkable progress in both prevention and treatment strategies for malaria. The World Health Organization’s recommendation of dual-ingredient insecticide-treated bed nets in March 2023 marks a significant milestone in preventing malaria transmission by Anopheles mosquitoes. These nets, including those with more lethal insecticide combinations and those disrupting mosquito growth, are key tools in malaria prevention efforts.

LEARN MORE: ALL ABOUT HEALTHCARE

The Importance of Cost-Effective Antimalarial Medicines:

Cost-effective antimalarial medicines play a crucial role in combating malaria. In 2021, approximately 45 million children between the ages of three months and five years received seasonal malaria chemoprevention, which involved monthly doses of therapeutic drugs at a cost of less than $4 per person. While this approach has shown promising results, the development of a groundbreaking vaccine brings renewed hope.

GSK’s Mosquirix (RTS,S) Vaccine:

GSK’s Mosquirix, also known as RTS,S, is an innovative vaccine that has the potential to transform the fight against malaria. This vaccine offers hope in preventing the disease, particularly among children in malaria-endemic regions. Although the current cost is relatively high, around $40 per child for the first year, it presents an essential step forward in malaria prevention efforts.

The Persistent Threat of Malaria:

Despite substantial investments of $26 billion to combat malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa, the number of cases has seen a slight increase between 2000 and 2019, although the number of deaths has decreased. This highlights the need for new prevention measures tailored to vulnerable populations, especially children. Taking inspiration from the Covid-19 pandemic, where monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated their potential, similar approaches could be explored in the fight against malaria.

The Potential of Monoclonal Antibodies:

Monoclonal antibodies, laboratory-made copies of immune system proteins, have shown immense potential in combating various diseases, including cancer and autoimmune disorders. Their remarkable selectivity and ability to target specific molecular markers make them an attractive option for preventive interventions. Researchers at the United States National Institutes of Health, led by Robert Seder, have identified two antibodies that target CSP-1, a protein used by the malaria parasite to invade liver cells. Clinical trials are currently underway in Mali and Kenya to assess their safety and efficacy, focusing on seasonal and year-round malaria transmission settings.

Game-Changing Potential:

Monoclonal antibodies have the potential to be a game-changer in malaria prevention, advancing the long-sought goal of eradication. The latest generation of antimalarial antibodies offers extended protection, with a single dose potentially safeguarding a child for at least three months, if not longer. Clinical trials will determine the extent and duration of this protection and guide future improvements to achieve a once-a-year injection.

Making Monoclonal Antibodies Accessible:

While monoclonal antibodies are often associated with high costs, efforts to increase their potency could significantly reduce expenses. It is estimated that an injection as small as one milliliter of the antibody drug being trialed in Mali and Kenya could protect children at a cost of only $5-10 per person. To ensure accessibility, it is crucial to engage national regulatory agencies and involve affected countries in the production of these biologics. While manufacturing antibodies is a complex and regulated process, investing in the necessary technology now would greatly benefit developing economies burdened by endemic malaria.

Addressing Disparities and Raising Awareness:

Currently, demand for monoclonal antibodies primarily comes from high-income countries, with Africa accounting for only 1% of global sales. This disparity underscores the importance of working with national regulatory agencies to address public health concerns and involve affected countries in the production and distribution of these life-saving biologics. Collaboration among government, academia, and industry is crucial to coordinate advocacy efforts and raise awareness about the potential of monoclonal antibodies in malaria prevention.

Preparing for Success:

While the deployment of the first generation of antimalarial antibodies is expected to occur no earlier than 2027, it is essential to start preparing for their potential success now. These antibodies hold tremendous promise as a powerful weapon in the fight against malaria, alongside bed nets, medicines, and emerging vaccines. Clinical trials will provide vital information on the extent of their efficacy, duration of protection, and dosage requirements. It is imperative to remain proactive and ensure that the necessary infrastructure and policies are in place to facilitate the widespread adoption of these breakthrough treatments.

Combining Science & Research:

As the world continues to battle the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, it is crucial not to overlook the persistent threat of malaria, especially in regions heavily impacted by poverty. While significant progress has been made in malaria prevention and treatment, the development of innovative solutions like GSK’s Mosquirix vaccine and the potential of monoclonal antibodies offer renewed hope in the fight against this deadly disease. By harnessing the lessons learned from Covid-19 research and engaging in collaborative efforts, we can work towards a future where malaria is no longer a major public health concern. Together, we can strive for the eradication of malaria and ensure a healthier future for vulnerable populations worldwide.


By Laura Richardson | Independent Contributor “The Voice Of EU

Thank You For Your Support!

— Compiled by Team VoiceOfEU.com

— For More: info@VoiceOfEU.com

— Anonymous News Submissions: press@VoiceOfEU.com


Continue Reading

Trending

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates 
directly on your inbox.

You have Successfully Subscribed!