The one million doses of the Janssen Covid-19 vaccine that the United States has donated to Mexico will be distributed along the northern border, according to Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. The head of state said the single-shot vaccine would be administered among the 18-40 age group in 39 municipalities along the US border in a bid to restore economic activity and commerce between the two countries. Border crossings are currently restricted to essential travel due to the coronavirus pandemic. “The intention is that vaccination in Mexico will advance at a similar rate to that of the United States,” said Marcelo Ebrard, Mexico’s secretary of foreign affairs.
The plan to use the Janssen vaccine to reactivate trade at the US border was an order from López Obrador, who has unveiled “a special vaccination plan for the northern border.”
Mexico has so far received 40 million vaccines and administered 33 million doses
“We believe that with these measures all of the sanitary conditions will be in place for the United States to agree to resume activities, if not all of them then a large majority, so that the economic, commercial and personal impact that has been caused in the border area can be brought to an end, a situation that has been extremely serious because it has now been over a year,” said Ebrard in reference to the partial closure of the world’s busiest border crossing due to the coronavirus pandemic and the campaign to vaccinate the 18-40 age group in the northern regions. The six Mexican states the government has chosen to concentrate on are Baja California, Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas.
The vaccine shipment from Janssen, which is a subsidiary of US multinational Johnson & Johnson, will cover around a third of the inhabitants of those six border states in the targeted age group. The Mexican government will have to obtain a further 1.9 million doses of the vaccine, either through a purchase agreement with Johnson & Johnson or via another donation from the Joe Biden administration, which has embarked on a campaign to provide six million shots from the US surplus to a dozen Latin American countries. On June 7, the White House unveiled plans to make 25 million doses available worldwide as part of its vaccine-sharing commitments.
“It shows that we have a good relationship, this is a plan we have been working on. It is necessary to act with solidarity and everyone has to help each other for the common good,” López Obrador said. The Mexican president announced the arrival of the vaccine shipment moments before the White House made an official statement, after a phone call with US Vice President Kamala Harris.
The Mexican authorities have not yet said when the vaccine rollout along the border will commence but the matter was discussed between López Obrador and Harris during the US vice-president’s visit on June 8, where she reiterated the Biden administration’s determination to dissuade migrants from the Northern Triangle of El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala from attempting to reach the US via Mexico. Harris also said a visit to the US-Mexico border was on her agenda.
The Janssen vaccine will be the sixth to be distributed in Mexico, but only the second that requires a single shot, after the CanSino vaccine from China. This is a key advantage to the rollout in the view of the Mexican government, as it the fact that the shipment will not require a network of deep-freeze facilities for distribution.
It is necessary to act with solidarity and everyone has to help each other for the common good
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador
Although the Janssen vaccine was among the first to be offered, the Mexican authorities have also taken up other options: the Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Russia’s Sputnik V and two Chinese vaccines, CanSino and Sinovac. Mexico has contracts in place for around 250 million doses in total and the position of the medical authorities is that it is no longer necessary to seek further purchase agreements to meet demand. After Mexico’s health regulator granted emergency use authorization for the Janssen vaccine on May 27, Deputy Health Minister Hugo López-Gatell said that Mexico had a “decent supply” through its acquisition of the other five vaccines.
However, another factor that may lead Mexico to seek to further bolster its supply is that the government wants to ramp up vaccination in tourism areas. The state of Quintana Roo, which contains popular destinations including Cancún, Tulum and Riviera Maya, is currently on the highest alert level after five weeks of resurgent coronavirus cases which have led to fears the region may be facing a new wave. Baja California Sur, where one of Mexico’s most-visited destinations, Los Cabos, is located, is in a similar situation albeit one the health authorities consider to be lower risk than Quintana Roo, according to the most recent reports on the spread of the coronavirus. In Mexico’s Caribbean resorts, state governments are in negotiations with the federal authorities to have tourism workers included among priority groups for vaccination.
June is viewed as a key month for Mexico’s vaccine rollout as the authorities expect to have around 25 million doses available. To date, the country has received 40 million vaccines and has administered 33 million doses. The government’s objective now is to speed up the rollout among the 40-49 age group, with the overall aim of vaccinating the entire adult population by October.
English version by Rob Train.
The Ukraine war in maps: Ukrainian forces battle to recover Snake Island | International
May 13 | The battle for Snake Island
The all-out attack that Russian troops deployed at the beginning of the offensive in Ukraine did not leave out maritime control of the Black Sea: the Kremlin’s naval force soon took up positions the island of Zmiinyi, also known as Snake Island and located around 140 kilometers (87 miles) south of Odessa and 40km (25 miles) from the Romanian coast. The first map of the conflict published by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) on February 25 showed it under Russian control even then. In a statement in February, the Ukrainian Navy said that the invaders had destroyed infrastructure on this island of one square kilometer. A comparison of satellite images captured before the invasion and in recent days shows that the destruction of the main building occurred between May 6 and 7.
August 23, 2016
May 6, 2022
Areas burnt by earlier attacks
May 7, 2022
May 8, 2022
Area of attack
(shown in video)
British intelligence warned last Tuesday that if Russian troops consolidate their position on the island, deploying air defense cruise missiles, they could control the northwest portion of the Black Sea. The permanent Russian settlement on Snake Islands entails sea, land and air control of that entire area, military strategy expert Oleh Zhdanov told the BBC.
The strategic importance of the islet, which grants control over maritime traffic in the port of Odes, is enough to justify the ongoing struggle for it. The Russian Defense Ministry has claimed that it destroyed several planes, helicopters, drones and a landing craft in the early hours of Sunday morning during a Ukrainian attempt to recapture the island. Ukraine claimed that it only attacked Russian troops deployed there. British intelligence stated that Ukraine has used drones to destroy Russian anti-aircraft defenses and supply ships, stranded after the invaders retreated to the Crimean coast following the sinking of the Moskva, the flagship of Russia’s Black Sea fleet.
The sensors of the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-2 satellites have made it possible to observe hot spots on the island which, in the context of war, can be associated with attacks. These indications of attacks have been recurrent since last February, and particularly intense during the last weekend, coinciding with a video of an attack on the island.
The proximity of Zmiinyi to NATO coasts has not prevented it from becoming a battlefield in the conflict. Armand Gosu, a professor of Russian Political History at the University of Bucharest, explained to Efe news agency that Moscow categorically dominates the Black Sea: “There is a huge military imbalance. Its ships patrol international waters without restriction, which has allowed the Russians to block a maritime outlet from Odessa,” he said. This blockade stifles Ukrainian sea exports that are essential to defend the coastal town from a hypothetical Russian siege like the one suffered by Mariupol.
March 8 A heat source can be seen in the northeast of the island, probably as a result of an attack, as well as a plume of smoke. The area inside the box contains most of the facilities.
March 23 Two weeks later, the Sentinel 2 satellite captured a new hot spot in a nearby area.
May 7 Once again a heat source can be seen, coinciding with a great column of smoke detected by satellites and shown earlier.
May 9 The last available image shows no hot spots, but the island’s vegetation has been largely burnt down as a result of the confrontation.
May 10 | Russian progress
In the two and a half months since the start of the Ukraine invasion, the Russian offensive has changed strategies: at first it sought to take control of the major cities, then focused its efforts on the separatist region of Donbas and on securing the borders. Since then, the frontline has moved in line with modest but systematic Russian advances that have only met with resistance at a spot that’s been highly militarized since 2014, when Russia annexed the Crimea peninsula. The change in the frontline can be seen in the following maps, which show the situation on the ground every two weeks since Russia changed its strategy on March 25. The red color shows areas under Russian control, which have been expanding for the last month and a half.
Donbas is an area covering around 52,000 square kilometers, roughly the size of Costa Rica. It is divided into two oblast (administrative units) – Donetsk and Luhansk. Along the northwest, it borders the Kharkiv region, home to the city of Izyum, which is the starting point for Russia’s attempt to encircle Ukrainian defenders holding the frontline. From there, Russian troops have been trying to advance towards Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, the military headquarters and de facto capital of Donetsk, although they have had limited success.
When the Kremlin’s troops announced that their target was eastern Ukraine, they were already controlling much of Donetsk, Luhansk and the area extending to Kharkiv.
Two weeks later, the situation on the front had barely changed after a reorganization of the invading troops except in the area of Izyum, the new Russian center of operations.
The siege of Mariupol, which made Ukrainian defenders retreat to an industrial site, allowed Russia to free up troops to cement control over the northern end of the city.
Despite Ukrainian counterattacks that are gaining back territory near Kharkiv, the areas under Russian control increasingly encircle the Donbas border
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) believes that the Kremlin’s forces near Izyum are regrouping and resupplying before resuming offensive operations in the southeast and southwest.
In the south of the country, near Crimea and the Black Sea, there is a similar situation: slow but constant Russian advances and reinforced positions in places like Kherson, which was swiftly captured in the early days of the invasion. Ukrainian counterattacks have barely made a dent on Russian forces, who have increased the territory under their control week after week. Moscow has been concentrating anti-aircraft and missile systems in the northern area of Crimea, said the ISW. This could be a prelude to resume offensive operations towards Zaporizhzhia and Kryvyi Rih, in central Ukraine.
Every drop is precious: the Mexican women saving water for their villages | Global development
Amazon: Violence in Colombia putting “the lungs of the world” at risk | International
Flying through the Amazon jungle, the pilot, a former Brazilian colonel, descends from 1500 to one thousand meters above sea level to approach the majestic Puré River.
The Puré crosses the border between Colombia and Brazil, a site that has become strategic for illegal mining and drug trafficking. In its channel more than 30 mining vessels can be seen from the colonel’s plane – tirelessly working to extract gold, illegally, from its waters.
In 2015 the National Parks of Colombia built a cabin called Puerto Franco in honor of the researcher Roberto Franco, the first to discover isolated indigenous peoples in Colombia, people who during the last centuries have decided not to have any contact with Western civilization. From the air, only remains of the cabin built in honor of Franco can be seen. Illegal armed groups burned it down during the pandemic.
This cabin had a very important purpose: to protect the isolated indigenous people of the Colombian Amazon. Indeed, in the depths of the Amazon jungle, very close to Puerto Franco, live the Yuri, an indigenous group that lives in voluntary isolation.
The Río Puré National Park was created for their protection and along with it the most remote cabin in Colombia. Park ranger Luis Rivas, 70, a traditional expert from the Cubeo ethnic group, lived here, charged with keeping illegal miners, drug traffickers and guerrillas away from the isolated indigenous people.
One night, in the midst of the pandemic, Rivas dreamed that he was in danger and asked Parks officials to remove him from the area. When he reached the nearest town, he caught Covid-19 and died. Some time later, officials from the National Parks found out about the destruction of Puerto Franco during a flight over the Puré River. Since the pandemic they have been unable to access protected areas in the Amazon due to threats from illegal groups that now dominate this territory.
The rangers of this national park, like those of nine others in the Colombian Amazon, which covers almost 15 million hectares, had to leave their territory from one day to the next. “We had to send a plane and get everyone out. There was no time, they threatened us,” says a former National Parks official who prefers not to give his name for fear of reprisals from the guerrillas. This former official believes that these threats respond to the implementation by the Government of the Artemisa strategy, a program to stop deforestation in the Amazon.
In 2020 Colombia was the most dangerous country for the second year in a row for environmental defenders. According to the British NGO Global Witness, 65 environmental leaders were murdered.
Although this crisis has been brewing for decades, it has worsened since the signing of the Peace Agreement between the Colombian government and the FARC guerrillas in 2016. “The organizations that try to protect the Amazon have come into conflict with the interests of these powerful groups. and, as a consequence, they have increasingly become targets of attacks”, explains Juan Carlos Garzón, a researcher at the Ideas for Peace Foundation.
“I am threatened by the guerrillas,” says anthropologist Arturo, 45, who prefers not to give his real name precisely for this reason. He has walked through the Amazon region with a security detail since he reported to the Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Non-Repetition in 2020 that the Carolina Ramírez guerrilla group arrived one day at the park cabin where he worked and told them that they had to leave. “They told us that they had declared war on Parks and that they did not want uniformed whites in the protected areas,” he recalls.
The guerrillas stole their gasoline, cameras, computers and all the material they used to study the terrain. “They only left us a small motorized boat to get out,” says Arturo, who decided to leave as soon as he could when he saw his life in danger. Since that time two years ago, whenever he has tried to return, so have the threats. Indigenous officials remained in charge of the parks while Arturo tried to continue leading the projects as best he could from a distance.
However, he recently decided to leave his post: the situation, he says, was becoming more and more frustrating. Arturo was part of a group of park rangers who brought a report to the Truth Commission and the Special Jurisdiction for Peace in which they asked to be recognized as victims of the armed conflict, considering that the guerrillas “took us out under threat and everything was abandoned. I feel very powerless,” he says.
Arturo wonders, what did National Parks do with those who are threatened for trying to take care of a territory that belongs to everyone?, although in truth he knows the answer: nothing. According to official data, 12 park rangers have been killed between 1994 and 2020.
The deputy director of National Parks of Colombia, Carolina Jarro, explains that at the moment they are under very strong pressure from illegal mining, a business that they estimate represents close to three billion Colombian pesos in profits for criminal groups each year. The proceeds, moreover, are used to launder the resources obtained from drug trafficking: “Attempts have been made to control illegal mining in the Puré River because the uncontacted indigenous groups are there,” explains Jarro, citing the burning of the Puerto Franco cabin.
The deputy director also notes that the guerrillas do not stop at threatening the park rangers, saying that they have stolen material from the organization that the rangers need to do their work. “Groups outside the law prefer not to have anyone to see what happens, that’s why they kicked us out,” Jarro says
Although officials are currently unable to be inside the parks full time, they are using remote sensing technology to monitor activity in these protected areas. “We can see when the guerrillas build a house, when they create a road. Thus, we can file criminal complaints about the damage that is being done. We have not abandoned the place, we have to go out for protection. But we are always watching,” Jarro says firmly.
Jarro has worked as an official in a park in the Amazon region for the last 10 years. A trained sociologist, she climbed the ranks of the administration before becoming head of a specific area, the name of which she cannot reveal due to the threat from the guerrillas. Its mission has been to protect a group of indigenous people who emerged from isolation some years ago, only to be enslaved by the miners and rubber tappers who exploited the area’s resources. Now, many of these indigenous people, from the Nukak ethnic group, are highly resistant to contact: “In the beginning, it was the indigenous people themselves who negotiated with the guerrillas so that they would let us enter and work with the communities. There was never a bigger problem.”
However, after the peace process, everything changed. “The guerrillas held me hostage for two days, and after that they told me that I couldn’t set foot in the park again,” says Juana.
The government’s response: Militarize
The only solution Colombia’s national government has come up with has been to militarize these protected areas via a program known as ‘Operation Artemisa’.
In 2020 President Duque said in an interview with the World Economic Forum that “our strategy for fighting deforestation is a combination of carrot and stick. We’re fighting against illegal activities that destroy the tropical jungle. At the same time, we’re building up nature-based solutions. In the past two years, we have been able to reduce the rate of deforestation by 19%.” Duque has since said his government is aiming for a 30% reduction overall.
This month the Minister of Defense, Diego Molano, announced that 10,000 million pesos will be invested in the military bases of La Pedrera and Tarapacá for the control of illegal mining and the fight against drug trafficking.
Esperanza Leal Gómez is Director of the Frankfurt Zoological Society in Colombia. She says that protecting environmental leaders is the responsibility of the whole Colombian state, which must guarantee conditions for workers in the National Parks so they can “operate…without putting their lives in danger.”
Gómez explains that the park rangers are not only essential for the conservation of the environment, but that they keep those at bay who want to exploit it: “The most latent threat is the dispute over territory between various illegal armed actors and civilians, who are being left unprotected.”
The director of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Colombia, Sandra Valenzuela, agrees. “As long as these threats continue, the national parks, their park rangers and uncontacted indigenous people will be in danger. Colombia must find a way to guarantee security and ensure the survival of the lungs of the world.”
Sirius Real Estate sells London business park for €18.8m (GB)
Web ad firms scrape email addresses before you know it • The Register
Southwold beach hut which is 10ft wide with no running water or electricity up for sale for £250,000
The 1915 Armenian Genocide and its Russophobic Origins
What’s artificial intelligence best at? Stealing human ideas | Technology
The Religious Roots of Russia’s Mistrust towards the West
Current1 week ago
How to renovate your kitchen… without breaking the bank
Global Affairs1 week ago
Killed by abortion laws: five women whose stories we must never forget | Women’s rights and gender equality
Technology1 week ago
Winning over giants like Intel key to growth • The Register
Technology6 days ago
UCD Energy Institute leads €16m project to decarbonise Irish energy sector
Technology7 days ago
Early wildfire detection system wins Analog Devices hackathon
Current1 week ago
Orient Express to open hotel in Venice (IT)
Current1 week ago
Genesta acquires office property in Oslo (NO)
Global Affairs7 days ago
Affordable Covid drugs kept out of reach by sluggish WTO | Global development